Bluzelle

Halal Rating :
Comfortable
Contract: 0x5732046a883704404f284ce41ffadd5b007fd668
Last Price $0.04 Last updated:
Rank 903
1D Change -0.17 %
Market Cap $18.49m
Circulating supply 463,583,539
Maximum supply None

Crypto Overview

Categories
  • Platform
  • Cosmos Ecosystem
  • Distributed Computing
  • Filesharing
  • Smart Contracts
  • Ethereum Ecosystem
  • Storage
  • Kenetic Capital Portfolio
  • Injective Ecosystem
  • DePIN

Project Overview

Bluzelle is a decentralized storage network that aims to provide scalable, secure, and reliable data storage services using blockchain technology. The BLZ token is the native utility token of the Bluzelle ecosystem, used for network governance and paying for storage services.

Purpose and Utility

The primary purpose of Bluzelle is to offer decentralized database services, allowing developers to store and manage data in a distributed manner. The BLZ token serves as the medium of exchange within this ecosystem, where users pay for storage services and validators earn rewards for maintaining the network.

Business Model Analysis

The business model focuses on providing decentralized storage solutions, which is a legitimate and halal business activity. There is no evidence of involvement in prohibited activities such as interest-based lending or gambling.

Real-World Adoption

Bluzelle has established partnerships with various blockchain projects and continues to develop its infrastructure. The network has active validators and users utilizing its storage services, though adoption remains in early stages.

Development Activity

The project maintains active development, with regular updates to its protocol and infrastructure. The team continues to enhance the network's capabilities and implement new features.

Token Distribution

The token distribution appears reasonable, with no concerning concentration in the hands of founders or early investors. Vesting schedules are in place to ensure long-term alignment of interests.

Rating Justification

Member Vote

Agree: 0 Disagree: 1

Login to vote on this

Comments