Cyclone Protocol

Halal Rating :
Comfortable
Contract: 0x8861cff2366c1128fd699b68304ad99a0764ef9a
Last Price $5.9 Last updated:
Rank 2592
1D Change -6.04 %
Market Cap $155,002
Circulating supply 26,282
Maximum supply 50,000

Crypto Overview

Categories
  • Ethereum Ecosystem
  • Polygon Ecosystem
  • IoTeX Ecosystem
  • BNB Chain Ecosystem

Purpose and Utility

Cyclone Protocol is a cross-chain privacy solution that enables users to make private transactions across different blockchain networks. The CYC token serves as a governance token for the protocol and is used for staking to earn protocol fees.

Business Model Analysis

The protocol's core function is to provide privacy-preserving transactions, which is a legitimate technological utility. The protocol generates revenue through transaction fees which are distributed to CYC stakers. While privacy tools can be used for both legitimate and illegitimate purposes, the technology itself is neutral and serves a valid purpose in protecting financial privacy.

Real-World Adoption

The protocol operates on multiple blockchains including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and Polygon. While exact usage statistics are difficult to verify due to the private nature of transactions, the protocol maintains active development and continues to expand its supported networks.

Platform Development

The project maintains regular development activity on GitHub and continues to implement protocol improvements and cross-chain integrations. The team regularly provides updates through official channels and documentation.

Token Distribution

CYC tokens were distributed through a fair launch mechanism, with no pre-mine for the team. There is a total supply of 10,000 CYC tokens. The token distribution appears relatively decentralized based on available on-chain data.

Revenue Model

The protocol's revenue model is based on transaction fees, which are distributed to stakers. This model does not involve interest-bearing loans or other prohibited activities under Islamic finance principles.

Rating Justification

Member Vote

Agree: 0 Disagree: 0

Login to vote on this

Comments

0 Comments

Login to join the discussion