Maker

Halal Rating :
Questionable
Last Price $1,526.43 Last updated:
Rank 70
1D Change 1.23 %
Market Cap $1.35b
Circulating supply 881,902
Maximum supply 1,005,577

Crypto Overview

Categories
  • Store Of Value
  • DeFi
  • DAO
  • Polychain Capital Portfolio
  • Governance
  • Lending & Borrowing
  • DragonFly Capital Portfolio
  • Electric Capital Portfolio
  • a16z Portfolio
  • 1Confirmation Portfolio
  • Placeholder Ventures Portfolio
  • Pantera Capital Portfolio
  • Paradigm Portfolio
  • Near Protocol Ecosystem
  • Arbitrum Ecosystem
  • Spartan Group
  • BNB Chain
  • Real World Assets

Understanding Maker Protocol

Maker (MKR) is a governance token that operates within the MakerDAO ecosystem, a decentralized autonomous organization that oversees the DAI stablecoin protocol. The primary utility of MKR tokens is to facilitate governance decisions within the protocol and act as a recapitalization source in extreme cases.

Intended and Actual Utility

The MakerDAO protocol enables users to generate DAI by depositing collateral assets into smart contracts called Vaults. MKR holders vote on critical parameters such as collateral types, stability fees, and risk parameters. The protocol generates revenue through stability fees paid by Vault users, which are then used to buy and burn MKR tokens, potentially increasing their value.

Real-World Adoption and Usage

MakerDAO has demonstrated significant real-world adoption, with over $7 billion in total value locked (TVL) at its peak and currently maintaining approximately $3.5 billion TVL. The protocol has established partnerships with traditional financial institutions and maintains active development.

Token Distribution and Governance

The initial MKR supply was distributed through a fair launch mechanism, with no pre-mine for founders. The token distribution appears relatively decentralized, with no single entity controlling a majority of tokens. The project maintains high transparency in its operations and governance decisions.

Revenue Model Analysis

The protocol's revenue model primarily relies on stability fees from Vault users, which technically could be considered a form of interest (riba). However, these fees are more accurately characterized as service fees for using the protocol's infrastructure rather than traditional interest-bearing loans.

Crypto Impact

To assign a comfort level investing in Maker from a halal perspective we need to determine whether it has a net positive or negative impact.

Towards this end, the table below is used to tally all the positive and negative considerations our members can think of related to Maker.

If you don’t see something that should be listed, positive or negative, feel free to submit your own contribution using the button “Contribute”.

We will review your contribution for accuracy before publication.

Importantly, you can review listed contributions and vote on which one you think has the greatest impact, positive or negative.

You only have one vote per asset so use it wisely.

You can change your vote if you change your mind.

Justification for our Halal Rating