Wrapped BNB

Halal Rating :
Comfortable
Contract: 0x418D75f65a02b3D53B2418FB8E1fe493759c7605
Last Price $992 Last updated:
Rank 9344
1D Change 0.65 %
Market Cap $1.57b
Circulating supply 1,582,885
Maximum supply None

Crypto Overview

Categories
  • Ethereum Ecosystem
  • Solana Ecosystem
  • Wrapped Tokens
  • Polygon Ecosystem
  • IoTeX Ecosystem
  • BNB Chain Ecosystem
  • Moonbeam Ecosystem
  • Osmosis Ecosystem
  • zkSync Era Ecosystem
  • Linea Ecosystem
  • Rehypothecated Crypto
  • Conflux Ecosystem
  • KardiaChain Ecosystem
  • RSK RBTC Ecosystem
  • Telos Ecosystem
  • Hoo Smart Chain Ecosystem
  • Aurora Ecosystem
  • Elastos Ecosystem
  • Milkomeda Ecosystem
  • Wemix Ecosystem
  • opBNB Ecosystem

Purpose and Utility

Wrapped BNB (WBNB) is an ERC-20 token representation of BNB that enables BNB to be used within the BNB Chain's DeFi ecosystem. It maintains a 1:1 peg with BNB through a wrapping mechanism where BNB is locked in a smart contract when WBNB is minted.

Business Model

The primary function of WBNB is to facilitate interoperability between BNB and BEP-20 tokens on the BNB Chain. When users want to interact with DeFi protocols on BNB Chain, they need to convert their BNB to WBNB first. This wrapping mechanism is transparent and verifiable on-chain.

Real-World Adoption

WBNB has significant adoption within the BNB Chain ecosystem, being one of the most widely used tokens for liquidity provision and trading. It serves as a crucial infrastructure component for the BNB Chain's DeFi ecosystem.

Platform Development

The WBNB contract is stable and well-audited. While it doesn't require ongoing development, it continues to serve its core function effectively as part of the BNB Chain infrastructure.

Token Distribution and Vesting

WBNB is created only when BNB is deposited into the wrapping smart contract, making it impossible for founders to pre-mine or allocate tokens to themselves. The supply is entirely determined by user demand for wrapped tokens.

Rating Justification

Member Vote

Agree: 0 Disagree: 0

Login to vote on this

Comments